Wednesday, September 3, 2008

http://cyberstalkers.blogspot.com/ info on mentioned people in here

http://cyberstalkers.blogspot.com/      http://cyberstalkers.blogspot.com/

STALKER 2 JOE CARMAN YORK S.C 106

THIS ONE A FALLING DOWN DRUNK SORRY TO SAY IS MAD AT ME AS THE LAB DID NOT SELL LIKE A TRUE ALCOHOLIC HE SPENDS HIS LIFE ON THE INTERNET BREAKING INTO ACCOUNTS WE WHERE FRIENDS ONE TIME ; ACE BAKER IS INSANE  AND COPYIES THIS OLD FOOL RANDY  WELL THEY KEEP PICKING AT WIKEYPEDIAS OUTDATED TRASH ON ME  LOTS OF LAUGHTS  TRYING TO MAKE IT WORSE  JACKALS OF INSANITY AND SELF HATRED LIKE AEIRRIEL LOUISE SERBAN  MY LAST HORRIFIC INTERNET PERSON CYBERSTALKER  DIED   SORRY I DONT WISH ANYBODY THAT BUT THESE FOLKS ARE MENTALY ILL AND LIVE IN THE INTERNET BUT THEY BREAK INTO ACCOUNTS 1C3 THEM A LOT

GEEZ I GOT A NEW CYBER STALKER THIS NUT i told him off with rought language

OptionsDisable Get Free Shots

The Anti-Truth Movement

Telling You What They WANT You to Know!Home About Anti-Truth About Rahne Everson Whenever I think "Ace Baker" I think "Red Dwarf"

August 1, 2007

“Blown to Kingdom Come” teh rock version



Rimmer: For a start, don’t call me “Rimmer.”

Lister: Why not?

Rimmer: Because you always put the emphasis on “Rim” in “Rimmer.” Makes me sound like a lavatory disinfectant.

Lister: Well what do you want me to call you? “Rim-MER?”

Rimmer: I don’t know. Um, “Arnie,” “Arn,” uh, something with a little more… I don’t know. How about “Big Man?”

Lister: “Big Man?”

Rimmer: Or what about the nickname I had at school?

Lister: What? “Bonehead?”

Rimmer: How did you know my nickname was “Bonehead”?

Lister: I was only guessing.

Rimmer: I didn’t mean that. I meant the other one.

Lister: What other one?

Rimmer: “Ace”!

Lister: Get out of town! Your nickname was never “Ace”! Maybe “Ace-hole.”



The fact that there are three minutes of end credits is hilariously mind-hurting.



I long ago wrote up a rebuttal to this piece of shlock because, on his site, Baker’s got links to conspiracy crap sites littered in the lyrics. Since Screw Loose Change posted the above video (something which I happily shoved from my mind, damn them), I took the excuse to post my version of the lyrics here.



———————————



“Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th, malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty.”

– George W. Bush, November 11, 2001



I hear people knockin’

9/11 truth.

They call us tin foil

Hat wearin’ kooks, but

What about the jet planes

flyin’ all around

While “our” mighty air defenses

were standin’ down?

They say that we should blindly

Believe “our” government

Before you start your preaching

Let me ask you this my friend…



Have you forgotten

What we saw as one?

Oh those towers turned to dust

They were blown to kingdom come.

Have you forgotten

Just how fast they fell?

Office fires can’t do that

No there ain’t no way in hell

And you try to blame it all

upon bin Laden

Have you forgotten?



“We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is–is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse.”

– Larry Silverstein, “America Rebuilds” (PBS) September 10, 2002



They destroyed the molten metal

From the WTC

It’s too incriminating

For you to see

That would blow the cover

That would solve the crime

The biggest inside job

Of all time

Some see a police state

Comin’ into view

After 9/11 man

I’d have to say that’s true



Have you forgotten

What we saw as one?

Oh those towers turned to dust

They were blown to kingdom come

Have you forgotten

Just how fast they fell?

Office fires can’t do that

No there ain’t no way in hell.

The “confession tape”

Looks nothing like bin Laden.



Have you forgotten? (”…outrageous conspiracy theories…”)

Have you forgotten? (”…outrageous…”)

Have you forgotten? (”…outrageous…”)



They got their new Pearl Harbor

To justify their wars.

The power and the money

That’s what they did it for.



*record skip*



“A year ago, my approval rating was in the 30s, my nominee for the Supreme Court had just withdrawn, and my Vice President had shot someone. Ahhh, those were the good old days.”

— George W. Bush, 2007 Radio-TV Correspondents’ Dinner



Have you forgotten

All the people killed?

As the empire marches on

Down to the oil fields.



Have you forgotten

About “our” Pentagon?

All the loved ones that we lost

To the Neo-Cons.



Have you forgotten?

Have you forgotten?

Have you forgotten?

Have you forgotten?



Face the truth.

Forget about bin Laden.

Have you forgotten? (”…outrageous conspiracy theories…”)

Have you forgotten? (”…outrageous conspiracy theories…”)



Forget about (”…outrageous…”)

Forget about bin Laden

Forget about (”…conspiracy theories…”)

Forget about bin Laden



Have you forgotten?



No, have you?



1 Comment
Ace Baker
Permalink

Posted by antitruthmovement





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



You are currently browsing the The Anti-Truth Movement weblog archives for the day Wednesday, August 1st, 2007.





August 2007 M T W T F S S

« Jul Feb »

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21 22 23 24 25 26

27 28 29 30 31



Archives

July 2008

March 2008

February 2008

August 2007

July 2007

Category Cloud

9/11 Ace Baker AIDS Angus Kress Gillespie anti-truth antivaccination Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Ben Stein books creationism creation science fair education Endgame evolution Expelled global warming Hoagland JFK lorry vandalism Monkey Girl moon shard Reclaiming History Robert Toggweiler TCCSA Texas trial Twin Towers Uncategorized Vincent Bugliosi weather control

Tags



Recent Posts

Well

Oklahoma, the First Amendment, and That Battle for America’s Soul Everyone Keeps Referring To

THE INTELLIGENT DESIGN AM WINNING AGAIN!

Battlegrounds of Evolution: Texas

John McCain and Autism

Recent Comments

Ace Baker on Whenever I think "Ace Bak…

Dil Egitimi on Oklahoma, the First Amendment,…



Baloney Detection

A Field Guide to Critical Thinking

Distinguishing Science from Pseudoscience

Logical Fallacies

Propoganda and Debating Techniques

The Baloney Detection Kit

Blogs

Bad Astronomy

Denialism

NeuroLogica

Panda’s Thumb

Pharyngula

RealClimate

Respectful Insolence

Science Based Medicine

Scientific American blog

Screw Loose Change

Skepchick

Podcasts

Astronomy Cast

Skepticality

Skeptoid

The Amazing Show

The Skeptic’s Guide to the Universe

Websites

9/11 Myths

Committee for Skeptical Inquiry

Fact Check

James Randi Educational Foundation

James Randi Lecture Series

QuackWatch

Secular Coalition for America

Snopes, Urban Legend Reference Pages

The New England Skeptical Society

The Nizkor Project

The Skeptic’s Dictionary

The Skeptic’s Society and Skeptic Magazine

The Straight Dope

The TalkOrigins Archive

Support!

Science Debate 2008: "A Presidential Debate on Science and America’s Future"



The Skeptologists!: "We are The Skeptologists. We're not willing to just accept stories of the paranormal or supernatural. We want proof."

Blog Stats

237 hits

Meta

Log in

Entries RSS

Comments RSS

WordPress.org

Theme: Contempt by Vault9.

Blog at WordPress.com.YOUR NEGATIVE COMMENTS ARE NOTED YOU FUCKING LITTLE SHITHEAD YOU BEND OVER AND KISS MY ASS WOULD BE JUST PERFECT ;; PUT THE MONEY IN ESCROW AS WELL YOU GET YOUR DEMO THAT'S MY RULES ON THIS IF YOU KEEP CHANGING THEM I WILL LAUNCH A LAWSUITE ON YOU AS WELL AS FILE A REPORT ON YOU AND THAT SHITHEAD IN SOUTH CAROLINIA JOE CARMAN YOUR BOTH MENTALY ILL NOT ONLY THAT ILL BRING IN TOP WITNESES TO KEEP YOU IN HAND I DON'T TRUST SLIMEY LITTLE PSYCHOTIC MANIPULATORS LIKE YOU AT ALL WHEN I COME TO LOS ANGELES DO NOT COME WITHIN A MILE OF ME ILL HAVE YOU ARRESTED BREACHING STALKING LAWS BY THE WAY YOU HAVE OTHERS TO WORRY ABOUT WHO DEVELOPED THE HUTCHISON EFFECT GO SUCK YOUR HERO RANDY;S ASS YOU INSIPID LITTLE FRUITCAKE YOU HAVE NO INSIDER PRIVLEDGES TO LOCKHEED OR THE USA GOVERNMENT ; FIRE REALY NOW WELL WHAT WAS ALL THAT SMOKE AND FIRE IN THE PENTAGON AND THOSE TOWERS? FUCKING TRULY STUPID FUCKING SHIT BS NO CONSIDERATION OF LOSS OF LIFE SOME WHERE FANS YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT YOU SHOULD BE CONCERNED ALSO OF THE AFTERMATH GOING ON THREW THE CONTROL FREAKS OF OUR FREEDOMS YOU HAVE NO CONCEPT OF 911 WAS AND AFTERMATH OF IT!!!!!! SO FUCK OFF PUT MONEY IN ESCROW COME UP AND VIDEO TAPE AND FUCK OFF OK I GOT LIFE TO LIVE YOU LIVE IN THE PAST IN A HALLICINATION WITHOUT REGARD TO OUR ARMY FIGHTING FOR YOUR FREEDOM AGAINST A BUNCH OF INSANE KILLERS




From: ace baker [mailto:acebaker1234@yahoo.com]

Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 8:44 PM

To: johnhutchison; Gryphon Productions

Cc: Judy Wood; Cb_Brooklyn; jfetzer@d.umn.edu; Russ Gerst; Jerry Leaphart; econrn@suddenlink.net

Subject: Re: Licensing HI-Quality Boat Experiment



John,



My pay schedule on what?



I will pay you $100,000 if and only if you demonstrate levitation of a steel wrench in my presence with video rolling. If you accept the challenge, and there are any details (pay schedule, other witnesses, broadcast rights, etc) requiring clarification, you or your representative are free to negotiate with me prior to the demonstration. We can put it all down in writing, using standard English (with punctuation, and lower case letters!).



On licensing your boat experiment video? I am interested in licensing your boat video if and only if it is 30 fps, with no frames edited out. I'm extremely interested in what may be on all those missing frames. Perhaps you could answer my questions.



I simply don't believe your claims of "military applications" or any of your alleged witnesses. I don't care about your book, and I don't care who wrote it. There are "scientists" who say the world trade center "collapsed" because of fire. I don't believe them either. If H-Effect is real, then demonstrate it to me. It ought to be easy. And very, very rewarding to you. Unless you're the filthy fraudulent liar that I think you are.





-Sincerely,



Ace Baker

Saturday, January 26, 2008

james randi the fake

nothing but a fraud








Who's Who of Media
Skeptics Examining Skeptics Skeptical Organisations
& Magazines The Demkina File Anomalistics Secrets of the Skeptics The Skeptical Observer

Intelligent Design Media Bias Skeptics in the Media Debates Energy Research Cosmology Extraterrestrials

Pioneering Investigators Current Research Organisations promoting open-minded research

Corporate Bias
Flawed Evidence
Bogus Skepticism
Experimenter Effects
Fraud


Email List
Bookshop
Links
About Skeptical
Investigations





Home > Investigating Skeptics > Examining Skeptics > Beware Pseudo-Skepticism



Beware Pseudo-Skepticism - The Randi Challenge

by Sean (aka Peebrain)



Reproduced from PsiPog.net

Back to...
Examining Skeptics



On January 29th, 2005, we were talking about the James Randi $1 Million Paranormal Challenge in the chat room. If you don't know what the Challenge is, the short version is that this ex-magician, James Randi, is willing to give a million dollars to anyone who can prove something paranormal. It's common for people to ask us why we don't take the Challenge with all the stuff we talk about on PsiPog. Clearly we qualify for the paranormal, and it would seem like easy money. While talking in the chat room, annie made the observation that the prize was in the form of bonds, and not cash. She tried to explain to me how bonds can be "worth" a million dollars legally, but in reality could be completely worthless.

So I decided to do some research on what might be going on. I had thought about taking the Challenge, and I know some of my friends have thought about it too... million bucks seems pretty sweet. But I've heard of stories about how Randi is dishonest, and it's all a scam. Either way, I figured researching would be the best way to figure out what the deal was.

I started by e-mailing Randi, and everything just went downhill from there. For me to type out everything that happened, it would take me forever, and it would be really boring to read. So this is what I'm going to do; I'm going to summarize what happened. Now obviously I am biased because I played a key role in this situation. I will try to summarize without being biased. But, you don't have to trust me... I will post the logs of what actually happened at the end, and if you want to take the time to read through it all and confirm my summary, then go right ahead. Also, because I am aware that I am biased, I am open for any discussion and questions on what happened. The best way to get in contact with me would be the chat room, the Q&A, or as a last resort, you can e-mail me at peebrain@psipog.net.

What is a bond, and why is it different than cash?
First, you have to understand how bonds work. I was really confused at first - I mean, if Randi is offering a million dollars, how can it be "worthless"? It seems very clear cut.
Bonds are certificates of debt. That means that a bond is basically an IOU. Corporations or governments need money to fund projects, so they go to rich people and say, "hey, give us some money, and we'll pay you some interest, and then after a while, we'll give you all your money back". Bonds have four key elements: who issued them, what the interest rate is, when they'll give the money back, and how much money was borrowed to begin with. The best way to show how it works is just to give you an example.
Let's say Bob's Bakery needs some money to buy baking equipment. Now, once they have the equipment, they can bake and make money - but they don't have any startup money to get the gears in motion. So they go to a rich guy and say, "Hey, if you give us $10,000, we'll pay you $100 every month for 24 months, then we'll give you your $10,000 back to you". This is appealing to Bob's Bakery because they can get their company started, and once it gets going, they'll start making money. From their profits, they'll take $100 each month and give it to the rich guy. Then after 24 months, they have a successful business, and pay the entire debt back to the rich guy. Bob's Baker keeps growing and making more money, and Bob is happy. The rich guy is also happy, because he just gives $10,000 to Bob, and doesn't have to do anything. The rich guy doesn't have to bake, or buy equipment, or hire employees, or any of that garbage. He just invests a small amount of his money, and in return gets $100 more a month, and all his money back after 24 months.

So, that's why and how bonds exist. Rich people want more money, and poor entrepreneurs want a successful business. (Of course, I'm simplifying this entire situation just to get the point across; in reality it's a little more complicated).

How can bonds be legally worth money, but be worthless?
Where is the problem? Well, what if Bob's Baker doesn't succeed, and goes bankrupt? What happens to the $10,000? Basically: it's lost. Rich guy doesn't get his $100 a month, and rich guy loses out on $10,000.

How does this all translate to the James Randi Million Dollar Challenge?
The prize isn't cash. The prize is bonds that are WORTH a million dollars. So, there are a lot of Bob's Baker people running around with the money, and they all gave Randi an IOU. And all these IOU's total to a million dollars.

Since the prize money is in the form of bonds, then it is possible that the bonds are worthless. For example, maybe a lot of the bonds are from corporations that are on the verge of going bankrupt? Or maybe the corporations don't have to pay off the bonds for another 40 years? In our example, Bob had to pay everything back in 24 months... this is called the "maturity" of the bond. Some bonds don't mature for a few years, others don't mature for a few decades. If Randi awards the prize of a bond that doesn't mature for 40 years, then legally I do have a million dollars... but I can't USE the million dollars until the bonds mature! As you can see, there are a lot of different scenarios where the bonds could be LEGALLY worth a million dollars, but in reality they could be worthless.

Does the Challenge have worthless bonds?
The next logical step is to find out what the bonds are really worth. To do that, I e-mailed Randi at the address he provided on his website. I politely pointed out where it said the prize was in bonds in the Challenge rules, and then I asked what corporations issued the bonds, what the interest rates were, and when the maturity dates are. These are the main factors at determining if the bonds are worthless or not.
Randi replied with, "Apply, or go away."
I explained to him that I wanted clarification on what he was offering. That this had nothing to do with my claim, but they were questions aimed at getting more information about the Challenge.
Randi replied with, "Immediately convertible into money. That's all I'm going to get involved in. Apply, or disappear."
Obviously that doesn't answer my question at all. Immediately convertible into how much money? Convertible through who?

Enter Kramer
I e-mailed Randi again, asking for clarification. I didn't mean to be annoying, but they weren't answering the question. Why would I apply if the bonds were worthless? The Challenge rules state that I am responsible for all costs incurred in the pursuit of the prize money... so it's quite possible that I could jump through all the hoops, spend my own money, and only have a pile of worthless bonds to show for it.

Randi passed me off to Kramer. Kramer's job is to handle all paranormal claims. Kramer introduced himself in an e-mail, "Randi has directed me to correspond with you directly regarding your inquiries into the JREF Challenge. [...] I handle all Challenge-related activities, so write to me here if you have more questions."

Ok, fair enough. So, I politely explained my situation to Kramer, and asked the same questions again. Kramer replied with, "So far, you're just full of shit. That's OUR perspective. Apply or go away. We don't have to prove anything to you. If you really have a claim, you'll apply."
Wow.

Enter JREF Forums
I'm not dumb... before e-mailing them, I had suspicion that things would get ugly. That's why I painfully tried to stay as polite, logical, and consistent from the start. Before emailing them, I noticed that Kramer would post e-mail conversations in the forums on their website, and comment about how the person e-mailing them is a moron. Now that I was the moron e-mailing them, I searched the forums for Kramer's new thread on the idiot asking about the bonds.

And I found it.
I expected to find a bunch of pseudo-skeptics making fun of me. And I did. What I didn't expect to find is that Kramer EDITED the e-mails before posting. All of the sudden, his "full of shit" comment was translated to "full of baloney." And Randi's "Apply, or disappear" was translated to "Apply, or don't apply." Similar minor translations were made to convert rude text, into stern but polite text.
Now, is that a big deal? Not really. Obviously it was a big deal to Kramer though, or he wouldn't have taken the time to edit it.

Luckily, my message was still getting across on the public log in the forum. Perhaps he edited the logs to make Randi and himself look better, but my questions were still there. To my surprise, some of the forum members sided with me. They thought my questions were legitimate.

Misinformation and misdirection
Since the other members agreed with my questions, Kramer decided to post an answer to them. This answer never made it back to my e-mail, and the only reason I found it was because I knew Kramer would try to make me look like an idiot on the forum (like he did with everyone else who e-mailed him privately). Kramer's answer was that the prize was CASH, and not bonds.

Whoa, ok, that's a surprise. The rules state: "...JREF will pay to the claimant the remainder of the reward, for a total of US$1,000,000. One million dollars in negotiable bonds is held by an investment firm in New York..." This can be read either way. Personally, I read it to say the prize is bonds. Kramer decided to interpret it that the prize is CASH (based on the "US$1,000,000" quote).

So I'm the idiot, right? Luckily, there were others who saw it my way. Maybe they didn't believe in the paranormal, but they were logical enough to see that I brought up a legitimate issue. If Kramer says the prize is cash, then the rules page should be changed.

During this time period, I began posting on the forums to clarify my position (and to point out that Kramer had edited the e-mails). The arguments were pretty interesting, but the meat of the matter still was: the rules aren't clear that the prize is cash, and if the prize is bonds, then what are the details about the bonds.

The next thing that happened absolutely blew me away. Kramer posted on the forums that he received an e-mail from me. In this e-mail, I complimented Kramer's hard work, and told him the issue was resolved. The only problem is: I never wrote or sent that e-mail.

A false e-mail?
I was in shock when I read what Kramer had posted. This wasn't minor edits to sway people one way or the other - this was blatant fabrication. To be fair, Kramer could have been a victim of someone posing as me. But let's look at the evidence.

I e-mailed both Randi and Kramer from a private account. I had not used that account for anything else. Nobody on the forums, nobody on PsiPog, and not even my close friends know what the account is. Only myself, Randi, and Kramer. For a third party to fake the e-mail, they would have to either e-mail Kramer from another account (which should make Kramer suspicious), or they would have had to fake an e-mail from my private account (which only myself, Randi, and Kramer know about).

On top of that, Kramer had already shown that he's willing to edit e-mails. I attempted to ask for a way to look into this fake e-mail situation more, but it quickly got brushed away under all the other arguments. Kramer certainly didn't care.

A noble idea
All the fraud aside, most members agreed that something should be done because things weren't clear from the start. A poster offered to write up an FAQ about the Challenge that could be posted on the website. The idea is that Kramer could direct people to the FAQ when they ask common questions, and this could save Kramer time.

In the drafting of the FAQ, the poster put a question about the form of the money. We had concluded on the forum that it was in cash, and not bonds. Remember? In the FAQ, the poster added the question:

"If someone wins, how will they be paid?
Although the prize money is held in bonds as a way to publicly show that the money really does exist, the bonds will be converted to US dollars before being paid. The first $10,000 of the prize money will be paid by check, as stated in the Challenge rules. The usual method for paying an amount as large as the remaining $990,000 is via electronic transfer, and it is reasonable to assume that that is how this prize money will be paid as well."

This is what Kramer had been telling us all along, and this was identified early as the source of "my confusion". Kramer loved the FAQ, and decided to officially post it on the website so he could refer people to it. Of course, he made a few edits to the draft. The final version of the FAQ is below:

"If I pass the formal test and win the Challenge, how will I be paid?
The first $10,000 of the prize money will be paid by check, as stated in the Challenge rules, immediately upon the successful demonstration of their claim. The prize money is held in the form of bonds as a way to publicly show that the money really does exist. These immediately convertible bonds will be awarded to the Challenge winner within 10 days of passing the formal test. The manner of transfer of these bonds will be at the discretion of the JREF and the Challenge winner, in accordance with acceptable legal standards."

It turns out the prize IS THE BONDS.
Wow.
So my original assumption was right after all. The prize is the bonds. And my questions have still gone unanswered. What is there to say? Well, the most obvious thing I've learned from this is that Kramer certainly isn't trustworthy. He edited the e-mails, and told everyone the prize was in cash. And no one knows where the false e-mail came from (and Kramer hasn't provided anyone with information that could help us figure it out). At the time of writing this, he hasn't addressed the original issues which sparked this entire fiasco (who issued the bonds, what are the interest rates, and when are the maturity dates?). And he hasn't addressed the issue of misleading EVERYONE on the forums, by stating that the prize is cash.

While the members of the forums show different levels of skepticism, Kramer certainly does not show anything relating to real skepticism. His mentality is that of a fundamentalist - he is right, everyone else is wrong, and it's ok to "bend" the truth to convince others. This is the exact opposite of healthy skepticism. If you are seriously considering taking the James Randi $1 Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge, it would be very naive to think it's as clear cut and simple as they portray it. When you put your signature on that application, you are signing a contract with them. If they have a hard time playing fair when it's just a few e-mails, imagine how they'll act when a million dollars is on the line (assuming that the bonds are actually worth anything to begin with, of course).


The Randi Prize


A Big So What? to
Randi's Challenge



Top of Page




Back to...
Examining Skeptics







If you have any comments or suggestions on this website please email... morphlist@aol.com
Copyright © The Association for Skeptical Investigations